The launch of new tokens is expected to exceed the record-breaking figures of DOGS – the ones that caused the multi-day network failure. Does this mean that the developers were unable to fix the situation during this time? Is TON not ready as a blockchain for such loads? How will this affect the authority of the network, since warning about a failure in advance is tantamount to admitting their helplessness and that the blockchain is raw?
Indeed, the fact that the developers warn about possible failures in advance could mean that they were unable to fully resolve the performance issues after previous incidents. This suggests that the current TON infrastructure may not be fully prepared for a sharp increase in activity expected with the launch of new popular tokens.
The warning about potential glitches can be viewed in two ways - on the one hand, it demonstrates the transparency and honesty of the team, on the other hand, it could be perceived as an admission of the technical limitations of the network.
This situation may well have a negative impact on TON's reputation as a reliable and scalable blockchain platform. Investors and users may begin to doubt the network's ability to cope with growing demand, which is critical for any blockchain project.
However, it should be noted that many blockchains have faced similar growth issues. The TON team's ability to quickly respond to emerging challenges and enhance network performance in the long term will be key to restoring user trust.